Free counter and web stats

Quick Poll

Do you support the capitali$t system?
Yes, competition is good!
No! Capitalism is a source of exploitation and oppression!
I am not sure.
I don't know and I don't care, 'cos my life is great.

Chat Board

~ Systeme ~
An sich n cooler post, aber kannst beim nächsten mal n bisschen detailierter sein?
~ Sussy ~
It was very interesting for me to read this article. Thanks for it. I like such themes and everything connected to them. I definitely want to read a bit more soon.
~ HoustonCPLHouston ~
Me and my wife are in the lifestyle. Infact we meet on a site called CT, http://bit.ly/3qpOkN Anybody whom is thinking about or are in the lifestyle, I would recomend joining and trying the free trial membership.
~ Spyware Blockers ~
I have been reading your posts lately, just want to say thanks for all informative stuff i have found here, helped me learn alot lately. Much Regards, Mark
~ Spanked Japon ~
eh.. good thread..
~ geld tricks ~
Ich merke gerade das ich diesen Blog deutlich öfter lesen sollte- da kommt man echt auf Ideen.
~ Steave ~
Great story you got here. It would be great to read something more concerning this matter.
~ Anaessato ~
I found this site on another forum and thought I would share it here. You have to see it to believe it. Its just wild!!! http://bit.ly/3Ygpx0
~ Anaessato ~
I found this site on another forum and thought I would share it here. You have to see it to believe it. Its just wild!!! http://bit.ly/1K2LDE
~ ㅠㅠ ~
I am lookin for caricature of corrupt politician..

Mailing List

My RSS Feeds








A few facts about Nestlé

posted Monday, 13 March 2006

A few facts about


Corporate Crimes:




  • Unethical Marketing of Artificial Baby Milk

    The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that 1.5 million infants die each year because of inappropriate feeding, because children vulnerable to disease are being bottle-fed on breastmilk substitutes rather than breastfed whenever possible.

    As the world's largest artificial baby milk producer controlling 40% of the market, Nestlé has been seen as a leading cause of this catastrophe, although other companies, such as Dutch company, Dumico and US company, Mead Johnson have also been implicated.

    For more info on this issue, see:
    BabyMilkAction.Org



  • Exploiting Farmers

    According to an investigative report by the BBC, hundreds of thousands of children in Mali, Burkina Faso and Togo were being purchased from their destitute parents and shipped to the Ivory Coast, to be sold as slaves to cocoa farms. The Ivory Coast is the biggest producer of cocoa worldwide. These children, ranging in age from 12 to14 years (and sometimes younger) were being forced to do hard manual labor 80 to 100 hours a week, paid nothing, barely fed and beaten regularly. In the widespread uproar caused by the reports, Nestlé expressed its 'concerns' over the use of child labour but could not confirm that none of its chocolate was derived from slave-labour sources.

    Nestlé has no fair trade policy to ensure that the producers of its cocoa and coffee are paid a living wage. As one of the four corporate giants dominating the coffee-roasting industry, along with Sara Lee, Kraft and Procter & Gamble, it is thus partially responsible for the plight of millions of coffee growers in the global south, who are being payed unfairly for their produce and face economic ruin due to collapsing world prices.



  • Union Busting

    There have been several examples of Nestlé being involved in denying workers their right to collectively bargain. In Colombia, where trade unionists have been consistently targeted by right-wing paramilitiaries, eight Nestlé employees affiliated with the Food and Drink Workers Union SINALTRAINAL have been assassinated. No evidence links the company directly to the assassinations, but its own policy towards unionised labour has been extremely aggressive.

    For more information, go to:
    ColumbiaSolidarity.Org.UK



  • Promotion of GM food

    More recently, Nestlé has been under attack for its enthusiasm for GM foods. It has been repeatedly targeted by Greenpeace and has done the minimum amount to avoid more pressure from European consumers. [51] When Thailand’s Anti-GMO Network demanded that the company adopt a GM-free policy, Nestlé Thani responded that it “believes that ingredients derived from GM crops that comply with strict regulatory and safety evaluations are safe for use in food production”. Nestlé spokespeople have frequently championed GM food in public, including Michael Garrett, who, unbelievably, having pointed out that the Chinese were planting crops over large areas and were eating GM food, said "You don't hear people in China complaining about it". No, you don't hear people complaining much in China at all, Mr Garrett.

    According to Greenpeace UK, although capitulating to consumer pressure in some areas over GM ingredients, they cannot provide assurances that the milk they use in their products does not come from GM-fed cattle. Of course this only can only be said about Nestlé products in the UK. Who knows what's inside Nestlé products in other parts of the world.

    For a list of producers using GM ingredients, check out this list by:
    GREENPEACE UK



  • The Ethiopia scandal

    Just before Christmas 2002, Oxfam revealed that Nestlé was demanding millions of dollars in compensation from Ethiopia – precisely when the country was in the midst of an extreme drought that put over 11 million people at risk for starvation.

    For a newspaper article regarding this, go here:
    Guardian.Co.UK



  • Illegal extraction of groundwater

    Nestlé production of mineral water involves the abuse of vulnerable water resources. In the Serra da Mantiqueira region of Brazil, home to the “circuit of waters” park whose groundwater has a high mineral content and medicinal properties, over-pumping has resulted in depletion and long-term damage. In 2001, residents investigating changes in the taste of the water and the complete dry-out of one of the springs discovered that Nestlé/Perrier was pumping huge amounts of water in the park from a well 150 meters deep. The water was then demineralized and transformed into table water for the “Pure Life” brand. Water usually needs hundreds of years inside the earth to be slowly enriched by minerals, and overpumping decreases its mineral content for years to come. Demineralisation is illegal in Brazil, and after the “Citizens for Water” movement turned to the authorities, a federal investigation was opened which resulted in charges against Nestlé/Perrier. Although Nestlé lost the legal action, pumping continues as it gets through the appeal procedures, a legal process which could take ten years.



  • Pollution

    Nestlé has been involved in a number of pollution incidents, including one at a pumpkin processing plant. Incidents of this kind show the hazardous nature of industrial food production: even apparently benign materials like pumpkin can turn into a serious hazard in large enough quantities. Nestlé has also been involved in water pollution incidents all over the globe.



  • Pyres of Burning Animals

    Nestlé has recently been exposed regarding its part in persuading the British government not to vaccinate livestock during the Foot and Mouth disease crisis. The then Chief Executive of Nestlé UK, Peter Blackburn, who is also president of the Food and Drink Federation, lobbied the government, which was apparently about to introduce a vaccination programme, and, along with the National Farmers' Union, who also opposed vaccination, managed to force a complete turnaround in policy. This is thought to be because Nestlé's profit's would be damaged by the loss of exports of powdered milk. It would probably have meant the closure of Nestlé's factory in Dalston, Cumbria, which employs 500 people and is a major producer of powdered milk to developing countries.



  • Fraudulent Labelling

    In November 2002, police ordered Nestlé Colombia to decommission 200 tons of imported powdered milk. The milk had come from Uruguay under the brand name Conaprole, but the sacks had been repackaged with labels stating they had come from a local Nestlé factory, and stamped with false production dates of 20th September and 6th October 2002. The real production dates were between August 2001 and February 2002.

    A month later another 120 tons with similarly false country of origin and production dates were discovered, pointing to systematic fraud. The discoveries caused a stir, with senators insisting the Attorney General conduct a full inquiry leading to prosecutions. Senator Jorge Enrique Robledo charged Nestlé with using sub-standard, contaminated milk, “a serious attack on the health of our people, especially the children”.



  • Perpetuating Sexism

    Nestlé has been sponsoring beauty contests, for example Miss Philippines 2001,  encouraging the view that women are objects for looking at.



  • Promoting unhealthy food

    A recent report by the UK Consumers Association claims that 7 out of the 15 breakfast cereals with the highest levels of sugar, fat and salt were Nestlé products. Unsuprisingly, Nestlé dismisses the role of corporate responsibility in promoting healthy food.

    Article about the Consumer Association report on cereals can be found here:
    TimesOnline.Co.UK



  • Promoting untested nano-technology

    Food and cosmetic companies are now collaborating to develop “cosmetic nutritional supplements.” L’Oréal and Nestlé recently formed Laboratoires Innéov, a 50/50 joint venture. Innéov’s first product, called “Innéov Firmness,” contains lycopene. The supplement is taken orally and is marketed to women over 40 who are concerned about lost skin elasticity. Shortly after Nestlé cemented its collaboration with L’Oréal, Procter & Gamble and Olay announced they would be creating two lines of nutritional supplements together – one for “Beauty” and one for “Wellness.” While these particular supplements are not advertised as using nano-scale technologies, it is difficult to be sure since there are no labelling requirements.

    L’Oréal, the world’s leading cosmetics firm, already markets skin care products containing nano-scale particles. (Nestlé holds a 49% stake in L’Oréal.) The company’'s "nanosomes” are tiny intercellular delivery systems that penetrate the skin and then release Vitamin E. According to L’Oréal, “Given that the interstices of the outer layer of skin measure about 100 nanometers, nanovectors offer the best solution to the problem of transporting and concentrating active ingredients in the skin.”



  • Backlashing against FairTrade

    With coffee production in deep crisis due to overproduction, the collapse of the International Coffee Agreement and a highly concentrated industry and the prices paid to producers massively declining, some have seen mainstreaming fairtrade coffee as a possible solution. Nestlé disagree. Nestlé 'do not believe that the fair-trade approach is a solution for the present coffee crisis' because it would 'encourage those farmers to increase coffee production, further distorting the imbalance between supply and demand and, therefore, depressing prices for green coffee'. Nestlé claim that their purchase of 14% of beans directly from farmers 'enables the farmer to retain a greater portion of the price paid by Nestlé, therefore improving his income'.

    This is not necessarily the case, however. With prices so low at the moment, many coffee farmers have responded by increasing production to compensate for lost income. If farmers received a fair price for their coffee they would be more likely to reduce production than increase it.




~peace~

tags:    

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit